Quarantine speech what was it

It has now reached the stage where the very foundation of civilization are seriously threatened. The landmarks, the traditions which have marked the progress of civilization toward a condition of law and order and justice are being wiped away.

Without a declaration of war and without warning or justification of any kind, civilians, including vast numbers of women and children, are being ruthlessly murdered with bombs from the air.

In times of so-called peace,ships are being attacked and sunk by submarines without cause or notice. Nations are fomenting and taking sides in civil warfare in nations that have never done them any harm. Nations claiming freedom for themselves deny it to others.

Innocent peoples, innocent nations are being cruelly sacrificed to a greed for power and supremacy which is devoid of all sense of justice and humane considerations. If those things come to pass in other parts of the world, let no one imagine that America will escape, that America may expect mercy, that this Western hemisphere will not be attacked and that it will continue tranquilly and peacefully to carry on the ethics and the arts of civilization.

The storm will rage until every flower of culture is trampled and all human beings are leveled in a vast chaos. If those days are not to come to pass — if we are to have a world in which we can breathe freely and live in amity without fear — then the peace-loving nations must make a concerted effort to uphold laws and principles on which alone peace can rest secure.

The peace-loving nations must make a concerted effort in opposition to those violations of treaties and those ignorings of human instincts which today are creating a state of international anarchy and instability from which there is no escape through mere isolation or neutrality. Those who cherish their freedom and recognize and respect the equal right of their neighbors to be free and live in peace, must work together for the triumph of law and moral principles in order that peace, justice, and confidence may prevail throughout the world.

There must be a return to a belief in the pledged word, in the value of a signed treaty. There must be recognition of the fact that national morality is as vital as private morality. It may be that such a protest might be regarded by many, who claim to be realists, as futile, but may it not be that the heart of mankind is so filled with horror at the present needless suffering that that force could be mobilized in sufficient volume to lessen such cruelty in the days ahead.

Even though it may take 20 years, which God forbid, for civilization to make effective its corporate protest against this barbarism, surely strong voices may hasten the day. There is a solidarity and interdependence about the modern world, both technically and morally, which makes it impossible for any nation completely to isolate itself from economic and political upheavals in the rest of the world, especially when such upheavals appear to be spreading and not declining. There can be no stability or peace either within nations or between nations except under laws and moral standards adhered to by all.

International anarchy destroys every foundation for peace. It jeopardizes either the immediate or the future security of every nation, large or small. We are determined to keep out of war, yet we cannot insure ourselves against the disastrous effects of war and the dangers of involvement. We are adopting such measures as will minimize our risk of involvement, but we cannot have complete protection in a world of disorder in which confidence and security have broken down.

If civilization is to survive the principles of the Prince of Peace must be restored. Trust between nations must be revived. Most important of all, the will for peace on the part of peace-loving nations must express itself to the end that nations that may be tempted to violate their agreements and the rights of others will desist from such a course. There must be positive endeavors to preserve peace.

America hates war. America hopes for peace. Therefore, America actively engages in the search for peace. Grant Rutherford B. Hayes James A.

Garfield Chester A. Roosevelt Harry S. Truman Dwight D. Eisenhower John F. Kennedy Lyndon B. Bush Bill Clinton George W. Help inform the discussion Support the Miller Center.

University of Virginia Miller Center. October 5, Quarantine Speech. About this speech Franklin D. Roosevelt October 05, Source National Archives. Presidential Speeches Franklin D. Download media Download Audio. View Transcript. Transcript I am glad to come once again to Chicago and especially to have the opportunity of taking part in the dedication of this important project of civic betterment.

More Franklin D. Roosevelt speeches View all Franklin D. April 14, Fireside Chat On the Recession audio icon transcript icon. Discuss in greater detail the Spanish Civil War, noting that many individual Americans had differing viewpoints.

Those with left-leaning political views were supportive of the Spanish republic and favored intervention by the U. When no direct aid was given by the U. Conservative Americans, particularly political isolationists and religious Catholics, supported non-intervention and expressed sympathy with Franco.

Pose the following questions: What is the relationship between the president and the media in shaping foreign policy? Why was Roosevelt vague in his identification of aggressor nations? Prior to the lesson, advanced students could examine more primary sources from the Abraham Lincoln Brigade Archives website to understand why Americans were willing to break U. Their knowledge could be shared during the lesson. Prior to the lesson, struggling students could examine the summary of the Spanish Civil War on the Abraham Lincoln Brigade Archives website, or other appropriate encyclopedic sources, in order to understand the two sides fighting in the conflict, and share their knowledge during the lesson.

It seems to be unfortunately true that the epidemic of world lawlessness is spreading. When an epidemic of physical disease starts to spread, the community approves and joins in a quarantine of the patients in order to protect the health of the community against the spread of the disease. It is my determination to pursue a policy of peace and to adopt every practicable measure to avoid involvement in war.

It ought to be inconceivable that in this modern era, and in the face of experience, any nation could be so foolish and ruthless as to run the risk of plunging the whole world into war by invading and violating, in contravention of solemn treaties, the territory of other nations that have done them no real harm and which are too weak to protect themselves adequately.

Yet the peace of the world and the welfare and security of every nation is today being threatened by that very thing…. War is a contagion, whether it be declared or undeclared.

It can engulf states and peoples remote from the original scene of hostilities. We are determined to keep out of war, yet we cannot insure ourselves against the disastrous effects of war and the dangers of involvement. We are adopting such measures as will minimize our risk of involvement, but we cannot have complete protection in a world of disorder in which confidence and security have broken down.

If civilization is to survive, the principles of the Prince of Peace must be restored. Shattered trust between nations must be revived. Most important of all, the will for peace on the part of peace-loving nations must express itself to the end that nations that may be tempted to violate their agreements and the rights of others will desist from such a cause.

There must be positive endeavors to preserve peace. America hates war. America hopes for peace. Therefore, America actively engages in the search for peace. From the New York Herald Tribune:. President Roosevelt, for all his eloquence at Chicago, cannot be credited with anything…specific.